Review



growth rate  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 97

    Structured Review

    ATCC growth rate
    Growth Rate, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 111 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/growth rate/product/ATCC
    Average 97 stars, based on 111 article reviews
    growth rate - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    97/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    97
    ATCC growth rate
    Growth Rate, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/growth rate/product/ATCC
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    growth rate - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    ATCC lactobacillus plantarum atcc 8014 bacteria
    Lactobacillus Plantarum Atcc 8014 Bacteria, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/lactobacillus plantarum atcc 8014 bacteria/product/ATCC
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    lactobacillus plantarum atcc 8014 bacteria - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC l plantarum atcc 14917
    L Plantarum Atcc 14917, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/l plantarum atcc 14917/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    l plantarum atcc 14917 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC lactiplantibacillus plantarum
    Young adult control and Kdm5 LOF flies (5–7 days old) were treated with 5% sucrose (mock control), <t>Lactiplantibacillus</t> <t>plantarum</t> (Lp), Lactobacillus helveticus (Lh), or a 1:1 combination of Lp and Lh in 5% sucrose for 2–3 days, supplemented on standard fly food. Guts were dissected, homogenized and plated on selective agar media to quantify CFUs per gut of Acetobacter (A) , Enterobacter (B) and Lactobacilli (C) genera. Bars represent mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates, with duplicate technical platings per sample. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnetts multiple-comparisons test. **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
    Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/lactiplantibacillus plantarum/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    lactiplantibacillus plantarum - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    ATCC lactobacillus plantarum zdy 2013
    Young adult control and Kdm5 LOF flies (5–7 days old) were treated with 5% sucrose (mock control), <t>Lactiplantibacillus</t> <t>plantarum</t> (Lp), Lactobacillus helveticus (Lh), or a 1:1 combination of Lp and Lh in 5% sucrose for 2–3 days, supplemented on standard fly food. Guts were dissected, homogenized and plated on selective agar media to quantify CFUs per gut of Acetobacter (A) , Enterobacter (B) and Lactobacilli (C) genera. Bars represent mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates, with duplicate technical platings per sample. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnetts multiple-comparisons test. **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
    Lactobacillus Plantarum Zdy 2013, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/lactobacillus plantarum zdy 2013/product/ATCC
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    lactobacillus plantarum zdy 2013 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC lactiplantibacillus plantarum atcc 14917
    Young adult control and Kdm5 LOF flies (5–7 days old) were treated with 5% sucrose (mock control), <t>Lactiplantibacillus</t> <t>plantarum</t> (Lp), Lactobacillus helveticus (Lh), or a 1:1 combination of Lp and Lh in 5% sucrose for 2–3 days, supplemented on standard fly food. Guts were dissected, homogenized and plated on selective agar media to quantify CFUs per gut of Acetobacter (A) , Enterobacter (B) and Lactobacilli (C) genera. Bars represent mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates, with duplicate technical platings per sample. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnetts multiple-comparisons test. **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
    Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum Atcc 14917, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/lactiplantibacillus plantarum atcc 14917/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    lactiplantibacillus plantarum atcc 14917 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC lactiplantibacillus plantarum atcc 14917 lp
    Young adult control and Kdm5 LOF flies (5–7 days old) were treated with 5% sucrose (mock control), <t>Lactiplantibacillus</t> <t>plantarum</t> (Lp), Lactobacillus helveticus (Lh), or a 1:1 combination of Lp and Lh in 5% sucrose for 2–3 days, supplemented on standard fly food. Guts were dissected, homogenized and plated on selective agar media to quantify CFUs per gut of Acetobacter (A) , Enterobacter (B) and Lactobacilli (C) genera. Bars represent mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates, with duplicate technical platings per sample. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnetts multiple-comparisons test. **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
    Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum Atcc 14917 Lp, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/lactiplantibacillus plantarum atcc 14917 lp/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    lactiplantibacillus plantarum atcc 14917 lp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC atcc 14917
    Young adult control and Kdm5 LOF flies (5–7 days old) were treated with 5% sucrose (mock control), <t>Lactiplantibacillus</t> <t>plantarum</t> (Lp), Lactobacillus helveticus (Lh), or a 1:1 combination of Lp and Lh in 5% sucrose for 2–3 days, supplemented on standard fly food. Guts were dissected, homogenized and plated on selective agar media to quantify CFUs per gut of Acetobacter (A) , Enterobacter (B) and Lactobacilli (C) genera. Bars represent mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates, with duplicate technical platings per sample. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnetts multiple-comparisons test. **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
    Atcc 14917, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/atcc 14917/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    atcc 14917 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Young adult control and Kdm5 LOF flies (5–7 days old) were treated with 5% sucrose (mock control), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (Lp), Lactobacillus helveticus (Lh), or a 1:1 combination of Lp and Lh in 5% sucrose for 2–3 days, supplemented on standard fly food. Guts were dissected, homogenized and plated on selective agar media to quantify CFUs per gut of Acetobacter (A) , Enterobacter (B) and Lactobacilli (C) genera. Bars represent mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates, with duplicate technical platings per sample. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnetts multiple-comparisons test. **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Microbiota-Based Interventions Differentially Rescue Gut and Social Behavior Phenotypes in a Drosophila Autism-like Model

    doi: 10.64898/2026.01.09.698713

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Young adult control and Kdm5 LOF flies (5–7 days old) were treated with 5% sucrose (mock control), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (Lp), Lactobacillus helveticus (Lh), or a 1:1 combination of Lp and Lh in 5% sucrose for 2–3 days, supplemented on standard fly food. Guts were dissected, homogenized and plated on selective agar media to quantify CFUs per gut of Acetobacter (A) , Enterobacter (B) and Lactobacilli (C) genera. Bars represent mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates, with duplicate technical platings per sample. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnetts multiple-comparisons test. **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.

    Article Snippet: The probiotics used were Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (formerly known as Lactobacillus plantarum ) (ATCC 14917) and Lactobacillus helveticus (ATCC 15009), both obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Techniques: Control

    Young adult control and Kdm5 LOF flies (5–7 days old) were treated with 5% sucrose (mock control), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (Lp), Lactobacillus helveticus (Lh), or a 1:1 combination of Lp and Lh in 5% sucrose for 2–3 days, prior to behavioral testing. Social spacing behavior was assessed using the Social Distance assay. Histograms (A–H) show the percentage of flies occupying 0.5-cm distance bins, calculated based on the distance from the nearest to the farthest neighbor. Panels A–D correspond to control flies, and panels E–H correspond to Kdm5 LOF flies under the indicated treatment conditions. (I) The Social Space Index (SSI) was calculated as the percentage of flies in the first distance bin minus the percentage in the second bin for each condition. Positive SSI values indicate increased social proximity, whereas values at or below zero indicate reduced social interaction. Bars represent mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA followed by Šídák’s multiple-comparisons test. All post hoc comparisons were performed within genotypes; only the two statistically significant comparisons are indicated (**p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001).

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Microbiota-Based Interventions Differentially Rescue Gut and Social Behavior Phenotypes in a Drosophila Autism-like Model

    doi: 10.64898/2026.01.09.698713

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Young adult control and Kdm5 LOF flies (5–7 days old) were treated with 5% sucrose (mock control), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (Lp), Lactobacillus helveticus (Lh), or a 1:1 combination of Lp and Lh in 5% sucrose for 2–3 days, prior to behavioral testing. Social spacing behavior was assessed using the Social Distance assay. Histograms (A–H) show the percentage of flies occupying 0.5-cm distance bins, calculated based on the distance from the nearest to the farthest neighbor. Panels A–D correspond to control flies, and panels E–H correspond to Kdm5 LOF flies under the indicated treatment conditions. (I) The Social Space Index (SSI) was calculated as the percentage of flies in the first distance bin minus the percentage in the second bin for each condition. Positive SSI values indicate increased social proximity, whereas values at or below zero indicate reduced social interaction. Bars represent mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA followed by Šídák’s multiple-comparisons test. All post hoc comparisons were performed within genotypes; only the two statistically significant comparisons are indicated (**p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001).

    Article Snippet: The probiotics used were Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (formerly known as Lactobacillus plantarum ) (ATCC 14917) and Lactobacillus helveticus (ATCC 15009), both obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Techniques: Control

    Young adult control (gut-specific Lucierase RNAi ) and gut-specific Kdm5 RNAi flies (5-7 days old; RNAi induced at 29°C for 3 days) were treated with 5% sucrose (mock control), L. plantarum ( Lp ), L. helveticus ( Lh ) or a 1:1 combination of Lp and Lh in 5% sucrose for 2-3 days, supplemented on standard fly food. Guts were dissected, homogenized and plated on selective agar media to quantify CFUs per gut of Acetobacter (A) , Enterobacter (B) and Lactobacilli (C) genera. Bars represent mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates, with duplicate technical platings per sample. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s or Šídák’s multiple-comparisons test, as indicated. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Microbiota-Based Interventions Differentially Rescue Gut and Social Behavior Phenotypes in a Drosophila Autism-like Model

    doi: 10.64898/2026.01.09.698713

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Young adult control (gut-specific Lucierase RNAi ) and gut-specific Kdm5 RNAi flies (5-7 days old; RNAi induced at 29°C for 3 days) were treated with 5% sucrose (mock control), L. plantarum ( Lp ), L. helveticus ( Lh ) or a 1:1 combination of Lp and Lh in 5% sucrose for 2-3 days, supplemented on standard fly food. Guts were dissected, homogenized and plated on selective agar media to quantify CFUs per gut of Acetobacter (A) , Enterobacter (B) and Lactobacilli (C) genera. Bars represent mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates, with duplicate technical platings per sample. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s or Šídák’s multiple-comparisons test, as indicated. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.

    Article Snippet: The probiotics used were Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (formerly known as Lactobacillus plantarum ) (ATCC 14917) and Lactobacillus helveticus (ATCC 15009), both obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Techniques: Control

    Young adult control (gut-specific Lucierase RNAi ) and gut-specific Kdm5 RNAi flies (5-7 days old; (5-7 days old; RNAi induced at 29°C for 3 days) were treated with 5% sucrose (mock control), L. plantarum ( Lp ), L. helveticus ( Lh ) or a 1:1 combination of Lp and Lh in 5% sucrose for 2-3 days prior to behavioral testing. Social spacing behavior was assessed using the social distance assay. Histograms (A–H) show the percentage of flies occupying 0.5-cm distance bins, calculated based on the distance from each fly to its nearest neighbor. Panels A–D correspond to control flies, and panels E–H correspond to gut-specific Kdm5 RNAi flies under the indicated treatment conditions. (I) The Social Space Index (SSI) was calculated as the percentage of flies in the first distance bin minus the percentage in the second bin for each condition. Positive SSI values indicate increased social proximity, whereas SSI values ≤ 0 indicate reduced social interaction. Bars represent mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA followed by Šídák’s multiple-comparisons test; no post hoc SSI comparisons reached statistical significance.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Microbiota-Based Interventions Differentially Rescue Gut and Social Behavior Phenotypes in a Drosophila Autism-like Model

    doi: 10.64898/2026.01.09.698713

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Young adult control (gut-specific Lucierase RNAi ) and gut-specific Kdm5 RNAi flies (5-7 days old; (5-7 days old; RNAi induced at 29°C for 3 days) were treated with 5% sucrose (mock control), L. plantarum ( Lp ), L. helveticus ( Lh ) or a 1:1 combination of Lp and Lh in 5% sucrose for 2-3 days prior to behavioral testing. Social spacing behavior was assessed using the social distance assay. Histograms (A–H) show the percentage of flies occupying 0.5-cm distance bins, calculated based on the distance from each fly to its nearest neighbor. Panels A–D correspond to control flies, and panels E–H correspond to gut-specific Kdm5 RNAi flies under the indicated treatment conditions. (I) The Social Space Index (SSI) was calculated as the percentage of flies in the first distance bin minus the percentage in the second bin for each condition. Positive SSI values indicate increased social proximity, whereas SSI values ≤ 0 indicate reduced social interaction. Bars represent mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA followed by Šídák’s multiple-comparisons test; no post hoc SSI comparisons reached statistical significance.

    Article Snippet: The probiotics used were Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (formerly known as Lactobacillus plantarum ) (ATCC 14917) and Lactobacillus helveticus (ATCC 15009), both obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Techniques: Control

    Differential abundance analysis was performed on 16S rRNA gene sequencing data from recipient flies following FMT. (A) Coefficient plot showing differential abundance of selected bacterial taxa across donor–recipient combinations following FMT. Positive coefficient values indicate relative enrichment, whereas negative values indicate relative depletion. (B–C) Relative abundance of Lactobacillus plantarum (B) and Lactobacillus pentosus–plantarum (C) in control and Kdm5 LOF recipient flies following FMT. Individual points represent biological replicates. Each condition represents three independent biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined using differential abundance analysis with false discovery rate (FDR) correction. Adjusted p-values and coefficients are indicated where significant.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Microbiota-Based Interventions Differentially Rescue Gut and Social Behavior Phenotypes in a Drosophila Autism-like Model

    doi: 10.64898/2026.01.09.698713

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Differential abundance analysis was performed on 16S rRNA gene sequencing data from recipient flies following FMT. (A) Coefficient plot showing differential abundance of selected bacterial taxa across donor–recipient combinations following FMT. Positive coefficient values indicate relative enrichment, whereas negative values indicate relative depletion. (B–C) Relative abundance of Lactobacillus plantarum (B) and Lactobacillus pentosus–plantarum (C) in control and Kdm5 LOF recipient flies following FMT. Individual points represent biological replicates. Each condition represents three independent biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined using differential abundance analysis with false discovery rate (FDR) correction. Adjusted p-values and coefficients are indicated where significant.

    Article Snippet: The probiotics used were Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (formerly known as Lactobacillus plantarum ) (ATCC 14917) and Lactobacillus helveticus (ATCC 15009), both obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Techniques: Sequencing, Control